Literature Review (Search, Selection Condition, Methods, Importance, and Mistakes)

Literature Review
(Search, Selection Condition, Methods, Importance, and Mistakes)

 Literature Search 

There are a number of literature selection conditions that researchers must follow during the literature search.

1. During the literature search, researchers should take the literature from its primary sources and not from secondary sources.
2. During the literature search, researchers should not take from the literature not published in journals and refereed journals.
3. During the literature search, researchers should choose the literature related to the subject of the study and not to take from the literature not related to the problem and objectives of scientific research.
4. During the literature search, researchers should move away from the boring and detailed presentation of the selected literature.
5. During the literature search, researchers should not take the old literature.

 Methods of Research Literature Review and its arrangement 

There is no doubt that writing the research literature review in scientific research is not easy. Researchers do not randomly write the research literature review, but rather write the research literature review according to a particular method, such as historical sequence, subject matter, and so on. The following are the methods in which researchers write the research literature review in scientific research:

1. Historical sequence: The collection and discussion of literature based on the date of publication, and clarify the extent of development in the subject within a certain period of time. The research literature review is arranged in ascending order from oldest to newest or vice versa.
2. The method of topics: The method in which the research literature review is written and arranged based on the level of similarity of topics in the literature mentioned. Research literature review is categorized into several sections or topics to be more like a theoretical framework and often follow this method in studies and research.
3. General concepts of the topic: The researchers write the research literature review with the use of conceptual maps, which is a tree hierarchy of the subject.
4. Cause and effect: The researchers follow this method in causal studies or when there is a subject (based on this correlation).
5. Comparison of differences and similarities in comparative studies.
6. Classification based on research methodology: Researchers rely on this classification in the research literature review in the quantitative and qualitative research.

 The Importance of Literature Survey 

The importance of literary survey in scientific research is as follows:

1. Narrow the study questions.
2. Promote theoretical perception of the subject.
3. Provide a source for comparisons.
4. Provide inventory of relevant metadata.
5. Preparation of questions of observations and preliminary interviews.
6. Propose fields for classifying and coding data.
7. Provide more depth in analysis by stimulating questions while analyzing results.
8. Confirm the results of the study, or the results can be used to show the shortcomings of the current literature relevant to the subject matter.
9. Provide solid arguments about the importance of the study.

 Literature Review Help 

The researchers ask for literature review help in order to avoid the common mistakes that the researchers commit while writing the section of literature review in the research paper. Common mistakes in summarizing the literature review:

1. Researchers read the literature review of previous studies quickly: Reading the literature review of previous studies quickly can lose the opportunity for the researcher to see all the information in the researchers, so researchers may miss important information of literature review without paying attention.
2. Review of a specific type of literature: One of the most common mistakes is that the researchers write one type of literature review, such as the literature in the master's thesis, ignoring other sources.
3. Random review of the literature: Researchers should present the literature review in a sequential and logical manner, according to scientific bases. Many researchers make the mistake of returning to the results of previous studies that deal with these literature review without being seen.
4. Researchers steal the content of the literature review in previous studies without mentioning these literature review to the original authors: Researchers may collect their study from several other research. In this case, they will not make any addition to scientific research, but their research will be only a literary plagiarism.
5. Uncertainty of the validity of literature review in previous research: Many researchers trust in the results of previous research. This leads researchers to make a number of errors if the results of previous research are wrong, so researchers must be sure of the correctness of the results in previous research.
6. The wrong link between the researchers' own research and the literature review in previous studies: The failure of researchers in linking their research with the literature review in previous studies leads to the loss of their efforts in scientific research.
7. Lack of documentation of literature review in previous studies directly: There are researchers do not document the literature review in previous studies immediately after quotation from them. This leads to wasting time when they return to documenting them after the end of the writing of the research, so the literature review in previous studies should be documented directly.
8. A full summary of the literature review in previous studies: Many researchers summarize all the ideas in the literature review in previous studies, regardless of the importance of research. This is wrong. Researchers should only summarize ideas that fit their research.

 Watch: The Literature Review