What should a review include?

What should a review include?

 Elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper): 

• The first Elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) is: Select the objective:

The goal setting for the research paper should be the first step in a good literature review. This is done by writing a review paper. The researcher must know what he wants from this literature when writing a review paper. And he must check the question posed according to the required criteria to know what is the focus when writing a review paper.

• The second Elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) is: Conducting a comprehensive literature search:

In this step, a comprehensive survey of what has been written is reviewed to review good and complete review paper on a specific research topic. It must be determined what is the appropriate literature completely, and what kind of appropriate. The appropriate sources of literature should be chosen. A choice must be made between modern, reliable and varied scientific sources. The comprehensive review of appropriate materials should include books, articles, scientific journals for appropriate materials, reports, government documents and some conference reports. In addition to electronic sources. One of the places in the search for resources is libraries.

• The third Elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) is: “Note the reference details of the sources used”:

The source elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) are posted on the “date of publication, authors' names, and page numbers”.

• The fourth Elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) is: Reading the literature:

Criticism is read out to all sources and an attempt is made to find wildcards in these facts. You should also take notes continuously while reading and organize topics and ideas mentioned in the review. Special tables may need to be used in order to know how the different sources relate to one another.

• The fifth Elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) is: Literature analysis:

For writings to appear as powerful technical analysis, you must evaluate all sources, and the sources are used. To start with, you should ask yourself several questions, such as: What are the basic terms and concepts? How much is the link between this article and the topic at hand? What are the basic relationships and previous literary trends? What is the degree of reliability in the sources? What are the differences and similarities between these sources? Are there any gaps in this literature that require additional study?

• The sixth Elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) is: Writing a review paper:

The thesis report, which is important because it gives the reader a comprehensive overview of the topic being presented, must be started when writing a review paper.

 Writing the elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) in a good way: 

Sometimes it may require writing a review paper, the purpose of which is to demonstrate the student's ability to understand the literature in a particular subject, and this work can be done through analysis and information gathering with the aim of:

1. Determine the method in which advance writing a review paper has been made on this topic.
2. Provide a comprehensive view of the main concepts when writing a review paper.
3. Learn the basic forms and relationships of this literature.
4. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of this literature.
5. Check for some evidence contrary to the search.
6. Work to provide a solid introduction that builds the research paper survey.

 Characteristics of good elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper): 

There are a set of characteristics of elements of a review paper (good review paper/complete review paper) of good literature review for scientific research, the most important of these characteristics:

• Inclusivity:

It is necessary for the researcher to be interested in collecting information from various sources in a manner that serves the objectives of the study or research.

• Use of references:

It is important to mention all the references that the researcher quoted from, so that the reader and those who wish to benefit can refer to the information sources.

• Selectivity and selection of appropriate information:

It is important to clarify the mechanism for obtaining information through these references, and if there is a specific process through which the various references are sorted and selected based on some criteria to be used in the study.

• Mentioning what is related to the subject or field of research:

Depending on what the research needs (research goals or research questions) during the research process and extracting useful information from non-useful.

• Analysis and discussion:

It is important for the researcher to discuss and analyze the various theories, ideas and opinions related to the study. And not just quoting her. Whereas, this would display and clarify the researcher's analytical and logical capabilities and his familiarity with the subject of the study.

• Critical Thinking

It is imperative that the researcher be astute and not assume that everything he reads is correct. Rather, he should return to the sources and ensure that the information mentioned is correct. It is also important to be alert to an important point, which is that often, what is written in a research may not apply to what the research is trying to do. The environment in which this study was applied may be different. Consequently, it may not be appropriate to rely on its findings or information from it in the researcher's study.

• Balance in brainstorming:

It is important for the researcher to strive to present different ideas and opinions in a balanced manner. For example, it is not sufficient to mention the opinions and ideas that support his point of view. Rather, it is necessary to mention and discuss the contradictory opinions with an explanation of why the researcher supports, for example, an opinion without the other in a logical manner. So that the reader of the message can understand the reasons that led the researcher to support one opinion without the other.

• Analysis and connectivity:

It is important for the researcher to analyze and try to connect different opinions and suggest new ideas or new theories in the same field. Depending on what he discussed and analyzed in the various parts of the Literature Review. This will undoubtedly contribute to clarifying the researcher's familiarity with the subject and give strength to the study and the researcher.

 Watch: How To Write An Article Review 

With greetings: Al - Manara Consulting to help researchers and graduate students